Discussion
Loading...

#Tag

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Elen Le Foll πŸ‡«πŸ‡· πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ
Elen Le Foll πŸ‡«πŸ‡· πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ boosted
Serhii Nazarovets
@serhii@mstdn.science  Β·  activity timestamp 5 days ago

A new preprint on Ukrainian publications in Gold Open Access has a very telling Figure 12. And you know what? It’s a total disaster.

πŸ‘‰ https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850

It turns out that the largest shares of our APC spending go to MDPI and the Polish Aluna Publishing House. Even worse β€” the top list also includes β€œfamous” players like WSEAS, Sciedu Press, and the Georgian Association of Business Press = dubious publishers.

#OpenAccess #PredatoryPublishing #Ukraine #Science #APC #GoldOA

arXiv.org

APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023)

This study examines how Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine affected APCs, publishing patterns, and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars between 2020 and 2023. Data from Scopus covers articles published before (2020-2021) and after (2022-2023) the war's onset. Statistical analysis revealed a small but significant correlation between APC amounts and citation impact, though the effect size was minimal, suggesting higher APCs did not substantially boost citations. APC waivers offered by major publishers such as Springer and Elsevier since 2022 have led to only a slight increase in articles authored solely by Ukrainian scholars in their journals. Despite these waivers, MDPI and Aluna Publishing House maintained the largest shares of such publications, likely due to low rejection rates, fast publication, and - in Aluna's case - reduced APCs for Ukrainian authors. Between 2020 and 2023, the number of articles authored solely by Ukrainian scholars in foreign journals fell by 25.7%, and total APC spending declined by 24.6%, from EUR 1.24 million to EUR 0.93 million. Medicine accounted for the largest share of both articles and APC expenditure, with the majority published in Aluna journals. Ensuring genuine equity in scholarly communication requires alternative publishing models beyond APC-based Gold OA, guaranteeing equal opportunities to publish regardless of institutional or national affiliation. Reform must also address evaluation systems that prioritise output metrics over research quality and academic cultures that favour speed and APC payments over rigour, even when high-quality, no-cost publishing options are available.
APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850
APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850
APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Serhii Nazarovets
@serhii@mstdn.science  Β·  activity timestamp 5 days ago

A new preprint on Ukrainian publications in Gold Open Access has a very telling Figure 12. And you know what? It’s a total disaster.

πŸ‘‰ https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850

It turns out that the largest shares of our APC spending go to MDPI and the Polish Aluna Publishing House. Even worse β€” the top list also includes β€œfamous” players like WSEAS, Sciedu Press, and the Georgian Association of Business Press = dubious publishers.

#OpenAccess #PredatoryPublishing #Ukraine #Science #APC #GoldOA

arXiv.org

APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023)

This study examines how Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine affected APCs, publishing patterns, and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars between 2020 and 2023. Data from Scopus covers articles published before (2020-2021) and after (2022-2023) the war's onset. Statistical analysis revealed a small but significant correlation between APC amounts and citation impact, though the effect size was minimal, suggesting higher APCs did not substantially boost citations. APC waivers offered by major publishers such as Springer and Elsevier since 2022 have led to only a slight increase in articles authored solely by Ukrainian scholars in their journals. Despite these waivers, MDPI and Aluna Publishing House maintained the largest shares of such publications, likely due to low rejection rates, fast publication, and - in Aluna's case - reduced APCs for Ukrainian authors. Between 2020 and 2023, the number of articles authored solely by Ukrainian scholars in foreign journals fell by 25.7%, and total APC spending declined by 24.6%, from EUR 1.24 million to EUR 0.93 million. Medicine accounted for the largest share of both articles and APC expenditure, with the majority published in Aluna journals. Ensuring genuine equity in scholarly communication requires alternative publishing models beyond APC-based Gold OA, guaranteeing equal opportunities to publish regardless of institutional or national affiliation. Reform must also address evaluation systems that prioritise output metrics over research quality and academic cultures that favour speed and APC payments over rigour, even when high-quality, no-cost publishing options are available.
APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850
APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850
APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08850
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

Open Science

We are a network of scientists, developers and organizations building the next generation of digital spaces for open science.

Open Science: About Β· Code of conduct Β· Privacy Β· Users Β· Instances
Bonfire open science Β· 1.0.0-rc.3.6 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login