Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Osma A
@osma@mas.to  ·  activity timestamp 5 days ago

I'm just gonna put this out here again: changing #Bridgy Fed opt-in policy would increase its ability to bridge people over, without hurting anyone's privacy.

1. If you reply or react to a post from the other network, a stub profile should be created with that action shared.

1/2

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Osma A
@osma@mas.to replied  ·  activity timestamp 5 days ago

2. If you follow an account from the other network, a stub profile should be created.

3. Addressing an account over the bridge should be possible prior opt-in - at least if either of above is true.

4. Opt-in may remain for bridging non-reply public posts.

2/2

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Osma A
@osma@mas.to replied  ·  activity timestamp 5 days ago

These policies would remove the current "stalker follow" of people who see a bridged user without themselves being bridged. The recently implemented "these reactions to you were not bridged" DM is an improvement, but not a solution.

3/2

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Osma A
@osma@mas.to replied  ·  activity timestamp 5 days ago

"how does that not hurt anyone's privacy?"

The reply or reaction are public on both networks. It's not like it couldn't be seen without bridging. But not informing the OP is, and I've said this before, a breach of "contract" (or convention, if you prefer).

If you don't wish your public reaction to be seen, don't post it.

4/2

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

Open Science

We are a network of scientists, developers and organizations building the next generation of digital spaces for open science.

Open Science: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire open science · 1.0.0-rc.3.6 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login