Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Phil Stooke
@PhilStooke@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp last week

So Mariner 9 data produced four sites, prime and backup for each lander. But Viking had much better cameras and would have to certify them as safe. The very first pictures of the A1 site were fascinating... much too fascinating to be confident about landing. Here is Viking Orbiter 1 image 006A33 (the 33rd image taken by Viking Orbiter 1 on orbit 006) in the A1 ellipse. The resolution is 41m/pixel. Mariner 9's was 1 km/pixel for most areas, this looked featureless.
#mars #viking

Viking Orbiter 1 image 006A33 in the A1 landing ellipse. The area looked featureless in Mariner 9 images but it is quite rough with many small hills and craters. It was too rough to land in.
Viking Orbiter 1 image 006A33 in the A1 landing ellipse. The area looked featureless in Mariner 9 images but it is quite rough with many small hills and craters. It was too rough to land in.
Viking Orbiter 1 image 006A33 in the A1 landing ellipse. The area looked featureless in Mariner 9 images but it is quite rough with many small hills and craters. It was too rough to land in.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

Open Science

We are a network of scientists, developers and organizations building the next generation of digital spaces for open science.

Open Science: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire open science · 1.0.0-rc.2.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login