Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
F-Droid
@fdroidorg@floss.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

Broken links aside (fix incoming), #FDroid raises the case against the #Google developer forced registration once again.

We'll skip the small talk, go read, and better yet, spread this wide and far: https://f-droid.org/2025/09/29/google-developer-registration-decree.html so people are made aware, actions can be taken and #Android is kept truly open!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Load more Previous page
Tom Ritchford
@TomSwirly@toot.community replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@fdroidorg Signed!

Quibble: it's spelled "provenance", without the "i". 🙂

Thanks for doing this. It's not just the freedom to use our own gear the way we want it, it's the lack of desire to have American companies to tell us what to do.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
pak0st
@pak0st@fosstodon.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg I'm confused, why people think using de-googled ROM flavors won't have this restriction? Chances are Google will poison the Android SDK directly.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
trissc̈hen
@trisschen@plural.cafe replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg tbh I don’t exactly get how this affects F-Droid at all. Like, if you’re saying it does, I’m sure that’s true, but I don’t understand what Google is intending to do in that regard. Also obviously still incredibly evil of them regardless.

And what Google achieves with that for me (who was about to purchase a new not just Android but Google phone specifically) is making me delay that purchase and more seriously consider some sort of Linux phone instead 🙃

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jones
@jones@todon.nl replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg

Reading the post, more or less at half of the page, you write:

«The F-Droid project cannot require that developers register their apps through Google, but at the same time, we cannot “take over” the application identifiers for the open-source apps we distribute, as that would effectively seize exclusive distribution rights to those applications.»

This passage is unclear to me, could you explain better? Anyway, i don't understand how google could prevent a software developer to just release their source code and builds without registering themselves and their apps with google, so i guess that the problem would be with developers who want to put their apps on google's store too. I also guess they are many, for obvious reasons; anyway, if google will act accordingly to its announcement, i think f-droid should, if possible, go on distributing apps by those developers who would not choose to comply to google's diktat (while i seem to understand there would be no possible technical solution for those who would choose to comply).

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Viktoria D. Richards/Uddelhexe
@v_d_richards@literatur.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg

Ich würde mir auch vom @BMDS Beiträge dazu wünschen, wie die Einstellung zu dieser MonopolisierungsHandlung von Google ist, die faktisch dazu führt, dass die gesamte mobil digitale Alltagsnutzbarkeit von unverzichtbaren Diensten (Banking, Fahrkarten, NFC...) komplett von 2 US Konzernen abhängig gemacht wird.

Google hat damit faktisch komplette Kontrolle über 70+% des Handymarktes und dessen Software + Infrastruktur der EU.

Wohin kann man sich als Bürger wenden?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Viktoria D. Richards/Uddelhexe
@v_d_richards@literatur.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg

Question for understanding:

In case google isn't stopped by law:
Can in theory, users of custom rom degoogled Android versions in phones still use the F-Droid store like normal?

80% of my Apps now are open source anyways and the other ones ( as of now) work without google services or might be ok with microG.

I' d rather deal with not having Banking- Apps and nfc running on my phone ( not using both from phone anyways) than succumbing to googles world-domination fantasy.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Plsik (born in 320 ppm)
@plsik@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg The likely scenario is that those of us who use F-droid will eventually be able to circumvent this restriction. Even if I had to stop using the banking app on my phone, I could still use the browser on my phone or computer for banking transactions.
The rest of the population that uses Android won't even notice anything and will continue to download from Google Play whatever the ads show them.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Lyubomir Ganev :android:
@luboganev@androiddev.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg done

Sorry, no caption provided by author
Sorry, no caption provided by author
Sorry, no caption provided by author
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
⪨༒𓊈𒆜🅽🅴🆆🅼🅰🅽𒆜𓊉༒⪩
@Zivhokmah@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg
"The life of righteous may be swallowed by deceit for a time — but in the end, righteous will prevail."

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Benjamin Braatz
@HeptaSean@social.tchncs.de replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg Did they already announce if and how they want to force phone vendors to leave that requirement in *their* versions of Android?

If they only lose the title of “certified Android device” but everything else still works, it should be possible to demand from the vendors that they … just undo that for their flavours of Android.

Or is “certified Android device” the requirement imposed by *other* apps to be installable (the thing that makes a lot of banking apps not work on custom ROMs)?

Surely hope that @Fairphone (inactive on the fediverse?) will still allow me to run F-Droid irrespective if Google takes that plan back or not.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
rakoo
@rakoo@blah.rako.space replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago
@fdroidorg

> we cannot “take over” the application identifiers for the open-source apps we distribute, as that would effectively seize exclusive distribution rights to those applications.

I'm not sure I completely understand: does this mean that if an app chooses a unique name, say com.something.super.app, then it somehow belongs to google ? You don't want to becomo another central point of apps identification ? Naively it seems like every dev team could just distribute on f-droid with the id they choose, so I don't see what is blocking
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Ingo van Lil
@inguin@nerdculture.de replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg While I fully agree with your assessment and hope that Google's plans are stopped, I don't see why F-Droid couldn't register identifiers for distributed apps. There's no need for them to be the same identifiers the developers chose, is there?

My own app is distributed exclusively via F-Droid. I wouldn't mind if the F-Droid builds used an identifier like `org.f-droid.<my-app-id>`.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
TIM
@Nobodyknows789@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg I remember microsoft doing everything in it's power to destroy open-source alternatives to windows...now it's google's turn!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
novaTopFlex
@novaTopFlex@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg If we want #Android to be open, we need not permissive licensing, not #copyleft licensing, but a sense of “copyfarleft.”

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dan Brown
@danb@fosstodon.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg there's also the CMA which folks in the UK can report to. I documented my report here: https://danb.me/blog/google-developer-verification-cma/

Danb Blog

Reporting to the CMA: Google Android Developer Verification · Danb Blog

Recently Google announced a further push of its developer verification, in which it states that all apps on “certified Android devices” will be required to have developer verification. This includes apps which are distributed via other means like F-Droid or manual download, so goes far beyond the scope of their own distribution platform.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
César Pose
@cesarpose@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg We can also take more extreme and illegal measures against Google. In fact, it's certain to happen. Those with some knowledge will always be able to evade this. Ordinary users they are not worth it.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
ĞÖKÜ👻👻™
@GOKUSHRM@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@fdroidorg I'll ditch stock rom and ll install custom that doesn't need Google shit and ll install f-droid in and use my phone freely.... But I'll wait for Google final answer.... F-droid need to launch their own phone with full Foss at very minimal cost to destroy proprietorship of tech corporates .. We ll buy f-droid fun immediately. Now it's time

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Bolt
@boltx@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@radasbona @fdroidorg

Short answer: It depends on the ROM, not any Google apps. If it's from a major manufacturer, probably.

Long answer: It's only on "certified Android" devices, and by that they mean on ROMs that are "certified" by Google, and installed on devices, but you can still replace that "certified" ROM with a non-certified one, such as GrapheneOS, LineageOS, etc, which wouldn't be under the restriction.

https://www.android.com/certified/partners/

They clarify in their blog.
https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2025/08/elevating-android-security.html?m=1

Android Developers Blog

A new layer of security for certified Android devices

Starting in 2026 and in select countries first, Android apps must be registered to a verified developer in order to be installed.
Android

Android – Certified - Partners

Many manufacturers test Android devices for security and performance and preload them with Google apps. See manufacturers of certified devices.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
just a blåhaj
@a_blahaj@blahaj.zone replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@radasbona@vivaldi.net @fdroidorg@floss.social nope
if you disable/remove GMS and GPlay, google cannot do shit to your android
if you root, you can force it to install/replace GMS/GPlay with microG

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
𝔱𝔯𝔷𝔶𝔤𝔩𝔬𝔴 :lattentacle:
@trzyglow@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@radasbona @fdroidorg if i understood google's pitch of this walled garden concept correctly, then you wouldn't even be able to get into developer mode with the restriction.
(though it's been around a month since i've read it, so my memory could be off)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

Open Science

We are a network of scientists, developers and organizations building the next generation of digital spaces for open science.

Open Science: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire open science · 1.0.0-rc.2.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login