2hago 13.57 8ST
Tories oppose Labour's digital ID scheme - while also accepting
case for "proper national debate’
The Conservatives are another party ostensibly opposed to the governments
digital ID scheme, but where views are actually a bit more complicated.
Last night Kemi Badenoch, party leader, issued a statement that started:
44 This announcement is a desperate gimmick that will do nothing to stop the
boats.
But italso went on:
AA There are arguments for and against digital ID, but mandating its use would
be a very serious step that requires a proper national debate.
Badenoch’s position is complicated because members of her shadow cabinet
have different views on this (reflecting the fact that Conservatism has always
had an authoritarian wing and a liberarian wing). Chris Philp, the shadow
home secretary (with authoritarian leanings) said only last month that the
Tories would have to consider “very carefully” the case for backing
mandatory ID cards. But Andrew Griffith, the (more libertarian) shadow
business secretary, wrote an article very recently saying he was “very
opposed” to a mandatory scheme.
Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, was on the Today
programme this morning but floundered badly as she tried to explain quite
what aspect of the Labour plan the Tories found so objectionable.