Discussion
Loading...

Discussion

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Simon Tournier
@zimoun@social.sciences.re  ·  activity timestamp 11 months ago

This morning @khinsen gave a demonstration about how #CommonLisp could be an alternative for “notebooks” (interactive data analysis).

Why Common Lisp? Because it’s “stable” (standard), “simple” (choose Boring tech) and “malleable” (Read/Eval/Print/Loop). Maybe more…

Guess what? Easy to check out thanks #Guix! 😀

https://codeberg.org/khinsen/ratp-points-of-sale
https://boringtechnology.club
https://malleable.systems
#ReproducibleResearch #OpenScience

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
fediverse_user
@fediverse_user responded  ·  activity timestamp 11 months ago
@zimoun @khinsen how is common lisp boring and simple?
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

Open Science

We are a network of scientists, developers and organizations building the next generation of digital spaces for open science.

Open Science: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire open science · 1.0.0-rc.2.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login